|
Pieces of eight
| ||||||||
Here's an interesting hand from a Cambs & Hunts league match, where taking the losing line cost us 8 VPs (from a possible 17–3 win to a 9–11 loss). | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
After Rob opens 2NT and shows heart support I have enough for a slam, but there is an outside chance of a grand slam, so I cue-bid my controls. After my 6 cue-bid, Rob knows I'm looking for a grand slam, and—given his hand—to justify this, I must have the black aces that I've cue-bid, the Q J x x x, and something extra. The only extras I can
have are the Q, the K and the Q. Two of these make 7 cold, while the third gives it a 50% chance. So Rob now bid 7 (he cue-bid 6 to give himself time to work all this out).
Unfortunately I had the Q, so he now had to complement his excellent bidding with masterful play. He got the 8 lead. Now he should start by winning with the A, cashing the K Q, crossing to dummy's Q and ruffing the small spade to reach:
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
There are now 4 plausible lines to make the 13th trick:
Rough calculations show that all these lines are about 50%! Against non-expert opponents, line 4 is perhaps the best line, as they are unlikely to be familiar with defending against the trump squeeze, and might make it obvious by hesitating over their last discard. If not, your opponent is unlikely to bare the K with the Q looking threatening in dummy—they would look silly if you didn't have the J—and trying to ruff the J good succeeds in more of the cases where the squeeze fails.
Anyway, on the actual hand, the Q was doubleton offside, so all the lines except the finesse would have worked. Alas, Rob guessed wrong, and we lost 8 VPs and the match (the small slam was bid in the other room, so we lost 17 IMPs on this board instead of gaining 13).
| ||||||||