Motions For
The Sexcentenary Club (Peterhouse JCR) Open Meeting 10/11/06 – 8:00pm
– Upper Sex
Announcements
by the Committee
Questions to
the Committee
Address by
Mark Ferguson, CUSU President
Followed by questions to the CUSU President
Ordinary
Motions:
- JCR Committee Accountability
- Office Hours in College
- Glass Refuse Removal from Rooms
- Bar Prices
a. JCR
Committee Accountability
Proposed by: Pete Davies. Sex Club President
Seconded by: Mark Powell, AMALs President
The Sexcentenary Club notes that:
- There
have been issues in this and previous years with the fulfilment of
essential duties by members of the JCR committee, particularly in, but not
limited to, Ents and Amenities.
- The JCR committee currently has a unique position in the rooms ballot process in that they receive points before
they start their terms in office.
- The only disciplinary measure available to deal with the
non-fulfilment of roles is dismissal.
- The current dismissal procedure currently constitutionally requires
a majority vote of one quarter of the current Sex Club membership:
“Either a deliberate breach of duties or a consistent failure
to carry out responsibilities as detailed in Appendix C shall render any
Committee member liable to dismissal by a majority vote at an Open Meeting,
provided that at least one quarter of the entire membership of the Sexcentenary
Club votes in favour of such a dismissal.”
- This currently requires around 70 undergraduates, twice the average
open meeting attendance.
The Sexcentenary Club believes that:
- Dismissal is highly
unlikely for JCR committee members at present.
- This creates
feelings of complacency, and there is no other disciplinary procedure for
failure to carry out responsibilities.
- Room points should
be a reward for services rendered as well as an attraction to stand for
positions.
The Sexcentenary Club resolves:
- To amend the JCR
constitution Section D paragraph 11 to read:
“Either a deliberate
breach of duties or a consistent failure to carry out responsibilities as
detailed in Appendix C shall render any Committee member liable to dismissal by
a majority vote at a quorate Open Meeting.”
- To amend the rooms
ballot procedure such that points for JCR committee positions are awarded
over 2 ballots, half given at the start of the terms in office and half
for the following year, this second half being forfeit if the committee
member is dismissed during their term. This will also encourage more 1st
and 2nd years to stand for positions, improving their
representation in college.
b. Office Opening
Hours
Proposed by: Paul Powlesland, Sex Club External Officer
Seconded by: Dave Kerr, Sex Club Amenities Officer
The Sex
Club Notes:
- The available hours
for junior members’ enquiries to the college offices are as follows:
- College Office 10:00-13:00.
·
College Secretaries Office: 11:30- 12:00 and 14:30- 15:00.
·
Tutorial Office: 12:00- 13:00 and 14:15- 15:00.
- The important
administrative functions (e.g. exam entries and student loan processing)
that these offices carry out for junior members.
- The utter frustration of going to one of the offices, only to discover
that you were thinking of the opening time of a different office.
The Sex
Club Believes:
- That although it is
important for the various offices to have restrictions on the times that
junior members can make enquiries, it is inefficient and frustrating to
have all the offices having different and seemingly random opening hours.
The Sex
Club Resolves:
- To mandate the JCR
to negotiate with college to have all the offices accept enquiries from
junior members at the same times.
- To mandate the JCR
to request that the regularised opening time(s) be suitably for students
(e.g. lunchtime, when most are in college).
c. Glass Refuse Removal from Rooms
Proposed by: Dave Kerr, Sex Club Amenities Officer
Seconded by: Krzys Honowski,
Sex Club Ents Officer
The Sex Club Notes:
- Glassware is not being taken from college staircase kitchens and
rooms.
- When asked, bedders generally state it is
not their responsibility to remove empty bottles as rubbish from rooms and
kitchens.
- Glass jars from cooking are removed without any problems.
- It is beyond the duties of bedders to
clear up after undergraduate parties.
The Sex Club Believes:
- The origin of this ‘no glass bottles’ rule is in clearing up after
parties, which is indeed not part of the bedders’
job.
- Small amounts of glass bottles could be removed by bedders without much effort, much as glass jars in
bins are at present
- If recycling boxes could be provided in staircases, as they are in
many college houses, the problem would be eliminated and recycling of
glass would increase.
The Sex Club Resolves:
- To discuss with housekeeping the removal of the odd glass bottle
from rooms/kitchens as part of bedders’ duties.
- If this is not possible, to demand glass recycling bins in all
staircase kitchens from Housekeeping.
d.
College Bar Prices
Proposed
by: Katy Griffiths, Sex Club Bar & Buttery Officer
Seconded
by: Krzys Honowski, Sex
Club Ents Officer
The Sex Club Notes:
- College bar prices
have significantly risen over the past year.
- Popularity of the college bar has decreased compared to previous
years.
- Undergraduates now often bring their own drinks into the bar.
- Other college bars are considerably cheaper than Peterhouse.
- Other college bars often have restrictions on their use for people
from other colleges.
The Sex Club Believes:
- The bar should be a busy and vibrant hub of college social life.
- In order to make a profit, the bar must attract custom from
undergraduates.
- The bar should be more economical for Peterhouse
students.
The Sex Club Resolves:
- For the Bar and Buttery officer to protest the current price rises
with the bursar.
- To ask the bursar about discounts for drinks purchased using a Peterhouse university card.
3. If
the need arises, to allow further price rises for cash drinks purchases in order
to allow for the discounts on card drinks purchases.